 | |
 |
| Our Sponsors Pro Audio Products |
| |
|
|
| | Recording.org PRO SHOP Categories |
| |
|
|
|
| Pro Shop Random Audio Product |
| |
|
|
|
| | You are not subscriber of RECORDING. You can subscribe from here now! |
|
|
|
|
| We received 82063731 page views since March 15, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
| Recording Org Navigation Map |
|
| |
| |
Home |
| |
| |
Discussions |
| |
| |
Business Section |
| |
| |
Content |
| |
| |
Info |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your url ad could be here!
| Author |
Message |
its_jon
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Nov 15, 2008
Posts: 5
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:37 am |
  |
Hi..... If you have read this thread
http://recording.org/ftopict-48916.html
you will know that we are trying to build a basic recording facility for our brass band...
We were given one Shure Prologue 16L mic .... very old, needs a battery. Have read that its not so good a mic....
Now.... at the moment its our only benchmark.... so, for micing Brass would a SM57 provide better results than the 16L in two situations....
A) overhead for wide coverage
B) close up
?????
Here is a test recording we did with the 16L ..... its a Flac file.
http://www.jedforestinstrumentalband.org.uk/cornet_shure16L.flac
Do prologue 16L mic's excel in any one area ?
For example.... if we were offered 2 new SM57's or 4 old 16L's for the same price what would be the better deal ?
Thanks for any feedback
John
Scotland
PS.... as im starting to take notice of these things..... Noddy Holder had a 16L in front of him on Top of the Pops in 1983 singing Merry Xmas with Slade.....just seen it on TV and we are nowhere near December yet ! |
|
|
  |
 |
|
|
| | | | | | | Business Section (News, Articles Classifieds etc.) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|