| Our Sponsors Pro Audio Products |
| |
|
|
| | Pro Shop Random Audio Product |
| |
|
|
|
| | You are not subscriber of RECORDING. You can subscribe from here now! |
|
|
|
|
| We received 75302515 page views since March 15, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
| Recording Org Navigation Map |
|
| |
| |
Home |
| |
| |
Discussions |
| |
| |
Business Section |
| |
| |
Content |
| |
| |
Info |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| PASS IT ON! Please link back to RO |
| |
|
|
|
|
Your url ad could be here!
| Author |
Message |
RockmanXPR
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Jun 22, 2005
Posts: 38
Location: Northern California, Bay area
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Mon May 12, 2008 4:42 pm |
  |
Hi all,
Well I was writing up a song and recording it but wanted to hear any opions on the guitar Tracking with these 2 samples:
info on what is being done. I'm using a Ibanez 7 string guitar with a Tone Zone pickup in the bridge. Amp I am using is a Mesa Boogie 20/20 poweramp with a Triaxis preamp, cab is a Randall Iso cab with a Celestion 30 speaker. Mics being used are the typical SM57 and then on the 2nd time around recording I used a Sennheiser 421 for the guitars. No effects used, just straigt in a Mbox and recored to disk. They were also double tracked you can tell if you listen to the clips
SM57
http://soundclick.com/share?songid=6537613
Sennheiser 421
http://soundclick.com/share?songid=6537619
Do they sound full and tracked well, or the opposite? |
|
|
   |
 |
sshack
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Dec 25, 2007
Posts: 294
Location: Atlanta, Ga
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Tue May 13, 2008 10:05 am |
  |
It sounds like they're tracked well, but how good they sound relative to the rest of the instruments is going to be the key. Kind of hard to tell just having guitar samples.
At best, record with both at the same time and blend as/where needed.
If I had to guess though, I'd say the 57 will do you better for that style and tone.
Good luck. |
|
|
  |
 |
hueseph
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Oct 31, 2005
Posts: 1382
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Tue May 13, 2008 10:20 am |
  |
First of all, I'm biased as I'm partial to the 421 as opposed to the 57. I have to admit the 57 sounds "right". I can't help but think it would be easier to get the 421 into the mix though, once you lay down bass and drum tracks. Just my biased, opinion though. |
_________________ Ian Faith: "Certainly, in the topsy-turvy world of heavy rock, having a good solid piece of wood in your hand is often useful." |
|
   |
 |
RockmanXPR
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Jun 22, 2005
Posts: 38
Location: Northern California, Bay area
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Tue May 13, 2008 1:28 pm |
  |
Thanks for the input, yes for the past year after reading various sites and posts on this forum I'm a total fan of mic positioning (Duh, I know ) but with the current rig (tube gear and a Iso cab) and situation I'm in (Living in an apartment) I was hoping to come close to achieveing a good quality tracking setup for electric guitars.
Here is a rough mix of the song I'm recording with the guitars and the 421 mic, on the guitar I used the 1176 plugin limiter, 3 band eq (3db @ 100hz, -2db @500hz, and 3db @3khz), and a Plate verb using D-verb. after listening i might just roll off the high end a bit or reduce the track levels,
http://soundclick.com/share?songid=6511747
But this is still a work in progress and once I'm done I'll post it in the Critique forum. |
|
|
   |
 |
|
|
This topic sponsored by: Sound Performance Lab (Tube, Mastering, Analog Gear)
| |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
| | | | | | | Business Section (News, Articles Classifieds etc.) |
| |
|
|
|
|